tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post6530329116937654823..comments2024-02-11T22:40:20.959-05:00Comments on Question of the day: Fridays Are Supposed to be EasyAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18153935609499338685noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post-6280992658116550912009-05-18T14:13:00.000-04:002009-05-18T14:13:00.000-04:00It's 131.625It's 131.625Biller25https://www.blogger.com/profile/12020887916114220618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post-43181774605533534252009-05-17T12:18:00.000-04:002009-05-17T12:18:00.000-04:00I didn't catch a question mark other than in the n...I didn't catch a question mark other than in the non-numerical portion of the question... and seeing as how the numerical portion is found to be irrelevant to the overall question itself, the non-numerical part actually constitutes the entirety of the question. My answer is that no number should logically replace the question mark.i3rucei3rucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10206062025976849153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post-1733838554548344162009-05-17T07:55:00.000-04:002009-05-17T07:55:00.000-04:00131 5/8 common ratio = -1.5131 5/8 common ratio = -1.5Ryannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post-57326717099838989102009-05-16T00:09:00.000-04:002009-05-16T00:09:00.000-04:00THERE IS NO QUESTION MARK IN THE SEQUENCE!
THE ON...THERE IS NO QUESTION MARK IN THE SEQUENCE!<br /><br />THE ONLY QUESTION MARK IN THE POST IS IN THE QUESTION ITSELF!<br /><br />And it's grammatically necessary, so no number should replace it.<br /><br />Too snarky?Jolsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10248500941290864096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post-77026387215067572552009-05-15T01:30:00.000-04:002009-05-15T01:30:00.000-04:00131 5/8131 5/8Reyjrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03836390390304520891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15628310.post-12074335192579596282009-05-11T10:14:00.000-04:002009-05-11T10:14:00.000-04:00Each number is -1.5 times the previous number. So...Each number is -1.5 times the previous number. So the answer is 131 and 5/8Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18153935609499338685noreply@blogger.com